Enabling Factors of Common-Pool Tank Management in the Dryland Regions of Rural India: A Critical Review

Sourya Das¹

¹Assistant Professor, Rural Management Programme, Xavier Institute of Social Service, Ranchi. Emal: souryadas@xiss.ac.in,  souryadas.2005@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

The decline of common pool tanks in the dryland regions of rural India can be attributed to several factors. This paper attempts to analyse the enabling factors for the sustainable management of Indian tanks through a comprehensive literature review. Additionally, it seeks to identify the future research and actions needed to preserve such vital resources. It has been found that the strength of traditional mode of management needs to be recognised yet there is a huge scope for its modernisation. Research should focus on assessing the key features of traditional institutional arrangements and the evolving need for their modernization. Understanding the historical evolution of local institutional arrangements is crucial. Comparative studies should also be conducted to identify the strengths and weaknesses of different institutional arrangements and their outcomes.

Keywords: Tank; Common-pool resource; Institution; Sustainability; Dryland; India

DOI:

FULL TEXT:

---

REFERENCES:

Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World development, 29(10), 1649-1672.

Agrawal, A. (2003). Sustainable governance of common-pool resources: Context, methods, and politics. Annual review of anthropology, 32(1), 243-262.

Baland, J. M., & Platteau, J. P. (1996). Halting degradation of natural resources: Is there a role for rural communities? Food & Agriculture Org.

Balasubramanian, R. (2006, June). Institutional landscapes in common pool resource management: A case study of irrigation tanks in South India. In 11th Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, 19-23.

Balasubramanian, R., & Selvaraj, K. N. (2003). Poverty, private property and common pool resource management: The case of irrigation tanks in South India. SANDEE, Kathmandu, NP.

Blair, H. W. (1996). Democracy, equity and common property resource management in the Indian subcontinent. Development and Change, 27(3), 475-499.

Chowdhury, K., & Behera, B. (2021). Institutional dynamics and water resource management: the case of traditional water bodies in West Bengal, India. International Journal of water resources development, 38(5), 836-860.

Das, S., Behera, B., & Mishra, A. (2020). Property rights and institutional arrangements of a man-made wetland in dryland area of West Bengal, India. Wetlands, 40(6), 2553-2560.

Gurunathan, A., & Shanmugam, C. R. (2006, December). Customary rights and their relevance in modern tank management: Select cases in Tamil Nadu. In workshop entitled ‘Water, Law and the Commons’ organized in Delhi from (Vol. 8, pp. 1-17).

Jegadeesan, M., & Fujita, K. (2011). Deterioration of the informal tank institution in Tamil Nadu: Caste-based rural society and rapid economic development in India. Japanese Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 49(1), 93-123.

Low, B. S., & Heinen, J. T. (1993). Population, resources, and environment: Implications of human behavioral ecology for conservation. Population and Environment, 15(1), 7-41.

Mosse, D. (1997). The symbolic making of a common property resource: history, ecology and locality in a tank irrigated landscape in south India. Development and change, 28(3), 467-504.

Mosse, D. (1998, June). Making and misconceiving community in South Indian tank irrigation. In Crossing Boundaries: Conference of the International Association for Common Property, 10-14.

Mosse, D. (2006). Rule and representation: Transformations in the governance of the water commons in British South India. The Journal of Asian Studies, 65(1), 61-90.

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.

Pimentel, D., Harman, R., Pacenza, M., Pecarsky, J., & Pimentel, M. (1994). Natural resources and an optimum human population. Population and Environment, 15(5), 347-69.

Palanisami, K. (2022). Tank irrigation in India: Future management strategies and investment options. NABARD Research and Policy Series, (10).

Ravi, S. C., Umesh, K. B., Murthy, P. S., & Chandrakanth, M. G. (2021). Institutional interventions and governance for equity: Impact and policies from tank irrigation in Central Dry Zone of Karnataka.

Reddy, V. R., & Behera, B. (2009). Economic viability of rehabilitation of traditional water harvesting system: Empirical evidence from South India. Quarterly Journal of International Agriculture, 48(4), 321.

Reddy, V. R., & Behera, B. (2009). The economic and ecological impacts of tank restoration in South India. The European Journal of Development Research, 21, 112-136.

Reddy, V. R., Reddy, M. S., & Palanisami, K. (2018). Tank rehabilitation in India: Review of experiences and strategies. Agricultural water management, 209, 32-43.

Roy, D., & Kumari, S. (2019). Social actors in traditional tank rehabilitation: A case study of Tamil Nadu (India). Sustainable Water Resources Management, 5(2), 587-597.

Sakthivadivel, R., Gomathinayagam, P., & Shah, T. (2004). Rejuvenating irrigation tanks through local institutions. Economic and Political Weekly, 3521-3526.

Sarkar, S., & Ray, B. (2020). Collective action and tragedy of tank water. Arthaniti: Journal of Economic Theory and Practice, 19(2), 224-249.

Sreenivasan, R., & Kumar, P. A. (2004). Vision for village tanks of Tamil Nadu. Retrieved from https://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/items/69bc573e-2eb8-4a6d-830a-0a15f390e4d5

Vasimalai, M. P. (2006). Shaping stakeholders perspectives survival of the common traditional tanks in South India. International Association of Study of Common Property (IASCP), Bali, Indonesia.

Velankar, R. A. (2011). Village Tanks and Community Based Management in Gondia District, Maharashtra State, India.